<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>Oppugn.us</title>
    <link>http://oppugn.us/</link>
    <description>Get it off your chest, and on the internet where it belongs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    
        <item>
            <title>Programming, Motherfucker</title>
            <author>Zed A. Shaw</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1300784321.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1300784321.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 01:58:00 -0700</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;I think I&#39;m going to create the ultimate software development
methodology.  It&#39;ll be revolutionary compared to others because it will
focus on the one thing that gets software done.  Its entire focus will
be this one, glorious, completely useful activity for writing software.
It&#39;s name even embodies the perfection of this programming methodology.
The name is:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h1&gt;Programming, Motherfucker&lt;/h1&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That&#39;s right, my software development methodology will be: programming,
motherfucker.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;How will we solve problems?  By programming, motherfucker.&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>You Have The Right To Block</title>
            <author>Zed A. Shaw</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1293536844.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1293536844.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 03:32:57 -0800</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;Just today I was walking down the street and there was this old drunk
ass motherfucker and his buddy standing out in front of a grocery store.
The old guy wasn&#39;t so much standing as barely awake in his piss and shit
stained clothes while his obviously heroin addict buddy talked to him.
The old guy was ranting about Blacks, and Latinos, and anyone else he
just thought fucked up his life.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I walk by, just minding my own business on my way to catch the transit,
and dude yells at me, &#34;What the fuck you looking at?!&#34;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I yell back, &#34;Nothing shithead.&#34;  Now, normally I wouldn&#39;t bother, but
you know what, drunk old assholes in San Francisco are starting to piss
me off.  They get in your grill, get offended and mean when you don&#39;t
want to give them change, yell nasty evil shit at you, threaten people
and are generally just annoying as hell.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then I just keep on walking.  You see, the advantage of being a healthy
adult male is that I can actually walk away from a drunk old asshole and
don&#39;t have to give a shit about him or his fucking opinions.  He of
course started calling me every racist thing he could think up, even
though I&#39;m not Black, Latino, or Asian.  I just kept on walking.&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>How To Get Sued, Git(Hub) Style</title>
            <author>Zed A. Shaw</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1292644176.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1292644176.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:36:39 -0800</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;These days Jimmy Wales gets a lot of flack for his &lt;a href=&#34;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search&#34;&gt;Urgent
appeal&lt;/a&gt; donation campaign to
raise some 16 million dollars.  Holy shit, that&#39;s a lot of money, but
hey I bet wikipedia could use the cash.  They do real good work.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, try to ask for money and what do you get from the peanut gallery?
Parodies.  Everyone&#39;s doing a parody, and frankly most of them are
pretty lame.  Yawn.  Most of them though are smart enough to not try to
use their parody to actually collect money under false pretenses.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then comes the ever classy git and github guys.  I see &lt;a href=&#34;http://zedshaw.com/how_to_get_sued_github_style.jpg&#34;&gt;this
plea&lt;/a&gt; from some guy at
github who runs git or something like that.  I wouldn&#39;t know since I&#39;m not
smart enough to use git and I actually like user experience rather than just
pretending I do.  He&#39;s just some dude to me.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not really thinking about it I &lt;a href=&#34;http://zedshaw.com/how_to_get_sued_github_style.jpg&#34;&gt;read this&lt;/a&gt;, and think, well damn, I mean I hate git with a passion but if they need
money I&#39;d give a little if it&#39;s....hey wait a fucking minute.  Is this a
joke?&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>Operating systems, windows and focus.</title>
            <author>bb</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1291425435.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1291425435.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:09:13 +1000</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;Hi, my name is Brad Tomlinson. You can print that, if this makes it
anywhere.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Into it:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Goddamn fucking window focus. As in, application focus, context switching,
more so, and in great pain - forced window focus switching. One just fucking
happened to me then as I was typing this sentence, and again just now.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(ps, FUCK YOU ADOBE, every single one of your goddamn applications has a
separate updater and they all run on different schedules)&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>RE: Announcing The Oxymoron CSS Framework</title>
            <author>Alex Zelenskiy</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1291425337.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1291425337.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:40:00 -0500</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;Hi Zed,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just read your post on CSS. I do agree that it is often a very frustrating
language to use, but I think you are being somewhat unfair about how much it
sucks. Or maybe just how much it sucks in context.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CSS has a very steep learning curve, and is difficult to work with (in my
opinion) for a couple reasons:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;CSS/HTML behavior is not consistent across browsers. Every browsers
enjoys rendering websites in it&#39;s own special way and there is nothing you
can do to avoid it except just forgetting that some ways of doing stuff
exist and never using them again. In addition, there are a coupe things that
ALL browsers do that break how the specification is supposed to work
(z-index nesting, for example) because doing it the right way is hard.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Like you mentioned, everyone relies on tools like firebug to figure
out why something is on the left and not centered. This gets better with
experience, but that&#39;s not really the point.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;It is very easy to build small sites with css, but incredibly
difficult to build systems of css rules that can handle all of the style
needs of a large site concisely. Few people can build these systems, and
even after they are built they are fascinatingly easy to completely ruin.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>Announcing The Oxymoron CSS Framework</title>
            <author>Zed A. Shaw</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1287608776.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1287608776.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 13:54:23 -0700</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;UPDATE&lt;/em&gt;: There was a one character bug in this, you should update.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I absolutely hate CSS.  It has to be the most inconsistent, poorly
designed, bat shit fucking crazy piece of computing technology we have
today.  And remember, I used to code Ruby and Perl for a living.  If I&#39;m
saying CSS is bat shit crazy I mean it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My first problem with CSS is simply that it just never does what you
tell it to.  I say, &#34;make this a column CSS&#34; and it goes, &#34;What? No that
should go over here totally on the left and fuck you I like apples.&#34;  I
say, &#34;make this fill all of the parent div&#34; and CSS says, &#34;Sharks love
tiny needles, and no that will only take up the top part.&#34;  I say, &#34;Hey,
CENTER THIS&#34; and CSS says, &#34;My shoes have centered worms but your heading
will stay to the left.&#34;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would die without Firebug to help me figure out why CSS is doing
whatever the hell it&#39;s doing.&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>FU NYC</title>
            <author>Zed A. Shaw</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1286944278.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1286944278.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:20:06 -0700</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;Oh yeah, I did this thing back in the day called &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.zedshaw.com/essays/the_freehackers_union.html&#34;&gt;Freehackers
Union&lt;/a&gt; and
then it didn&#39;t go anywhere and
&lt;a href=&#34;http://www.zedshaw.com/blog/2009-03-16.html&#34;&gt;failed&lt;/a&gt; and then like
random people bring up that &lt;a href=&#34;http://sigusr2.net/2010/Oct/12/this-is-not-the-freehackers-union.html&#34;&gt;it
failed&lt;/a&gt;
almost two years later.  Awesome.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well I&#39;m sure this will be successful, since I&#39;m not running it and NYC
is primed for it.  You&#39;re welcome.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But, here&#39;s how I really solved the problem:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;h1&gt;I FUCKING MOVED TO SAN FRANCISCO&lt;/h1&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>Shove that idea straight up where it came from</title>
            <author>Charl van Niekerk</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1285329002.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1285329002.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 8 Sep 2010 01:55:44 +0200</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;As a developer I often get approached by various &#34;interesting&#34; and
&#34;creative&#34; entrepreneurial hopefuls with little to no budget. There
are some legit cases of young people with big dreams but usually that
just means they&#39;re not willing to put their money where their mouths
are. Be that as it may, they have a rather big attitude about being
&#34;broke&#34;. They are not willing to spill the beans without me signing
the mandatory NDA. Yes, the stock-standard template they pulled off
some site for fellow cheap-skates. If I only had $1 for each of those
I collected over the years, I would be stinking rich by now from that
alone! Could be good business, come to think of it... Should start
charging for those.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, after wasting some expensive ink and killing more trees I get
the pitch about their &#34;next&#34; brilliant venture (as if they are on a
streak or something). Apparently respraying your car to beige takes
more creative energy than forming a startup these days. The Christmas
Spirit lasts all year for these guys - in the spirit of giving they
will give me a full 50% of their precious equity if I end up doing all
the hard work at no pay while they are performing the exhausting work
of reading the Financial Times in the restroom for four hours every
morning. That only as a last resort as I&#39;m not in for that 20% crap.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Marketing too is a really big deal - after all, it&#39;s hard work to spam
all your luser friends on Twitter and Facebook until some douchebag VC
feels desperate enough to shed some cash. Such a burden to have spare
cash lying around in the middle of the biggest economic stuffup since
the 1930&#39;s...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The surprising thing is that, having 50% of the equity apparently does
not make you an equal partner. If any important business decisions
need to be made, how could I ever have expected to be consulted? After
all, I&#39;m just an employee that is getting paid in equity instead of
actual money. I might even have the hope of earning half a salary
after the investors step up to the plate and I had to live off
unemployment benefits for over six months. Who needs a car and
furniture anyway? Public transport is so much better and at least I
still own a mattress.&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>Fuck you ASP.NET</title>
            <author>Paul Tasima</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1285328997.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1285328997.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 09:35:45 +0100</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;Seriously. How is it possible that something that has had so much money
behind it cannot compete with the likes of the open source offerings. For
fuck&#39;s sake, stop obfuscating my Request and Response variables behind a
daft mechanism that requires me to learn an entire page rendering life cycle
according to M$ that has almost nothing in common with how web pages are
actually created just so I can get something slightly less ordinary done. We
aren&#39;t all retards you know. I&#39;m pretty sure we can all get to grips with
basics of web servers and HTTP protocols. The web is not Windows. We don&#39;t
need the stupid on-click hierarchy for our code to make sense. At the very
least, can you make the viewstate render at a sensible time the page life
cycle please?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Seriously. Classic ASP was actually better.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And while we are at it, when the fuck are you going to ship a decent ORM. I
mean come on! Rails....Django.....they&#39;ve managed. Where the fuck are you
with this? I&#39;m sure we could all get along just fine if you would at least
catch up to the other frameworks. Then we won&#39;t look like twats who can&#39;t
crank out code without a three month lead time just to set up our project
and create our admin CRUD.&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>a rant: fuck &#39;unexcepted item in bagging area&#39;</title>
            <author>Ted Nyman</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1285328931.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1285328931.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 23:11:37 -0700</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;FUCK &#39;UNEXPECTED ITEM IN BAGGING AREA&#39;
by Ted Nyman&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You may have encountered self-checkout machines at Safeway stores or
other fine middle-brow groceries throughout this nation and perhaps
even the world. You bring up your Frosted Flakes, Odwalla, whatever,
run through them a barcode detection thingy, pay via machine, and then
bag your groceries yourself. Like a boss. Now, some people prefer this
manner of checkout because it&#39;s often faster that using traditional
aisles. Personally I like it because it means I usually don&#39;t have to
talk to anyone at the grocery store, which is one of my main
objectives in daily life.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, there is one serious problem with the machines. And let me
tell you: this fault is not just a fucking annoyance -- it&#39;s also a
terrible UI fault. Yes, shoppers, you know what I&#39;m talking about:
&#34;UNEXPECTED ITEM IN BAGGING AREA&#34;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;First, there is no consistency to this error message (which is spoken
aloud to you in a pleasant female voice). Not even eventual
consistency. I scan my Oreos, put in the bagging area, and everything
is fine. Then I scan some Kraft pepper jack cheese (successfully it
seems), put the pepper jack cheese in the bagging area -- and all hell
breaks loose. UNEXPECTED ITEM IN BAGGING AREA. UNEXPECTED ITEM IN
BAGGING AREA. I look around, embarrassed at my terrible inability to
correctly scan and bag my items. Then some moderately attractive chick
wearing yoga pants gives me a look of scorn: &#34;I wonder if that guy
even WENT TO COLLEGE, he can&#39;t even operate a self-checkout machine!!&#34;
An older woman shakes her head in dismay; shit, even the fat dude in
sweatpants buying 30 cans of Chunky Campbell&#39;s Soup looks at me as if
I was Pol Pot.&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>Advice For The Bin 38 Super Angel Awesome Team</title>
            <author>Zed A. Shaw</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1285149731.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1285149731.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 02:50:29 -0700</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;I&#39;m not a rich guy by any stretch of the word &#34;wealth&#34;.  I mean, I
pretty much live off donations writing &lt;a href=&#34;http://mongrel2.org&#34;&gt;awesome
code&lt;/a&gt; that nobody will make a movie about later.
I&#39;ve got some sweet guitars, and a couple nice computers.  I get to eat
some alright food.  Yeah I&#39;m doing pretty decent, but definitely not
wealthy at all.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But let me tell you, if I had the money that a &#34;Super Angel&#34; has, I sure
as hell wouldn&#39;t pick a &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.bin38.com/&#34;&gt;shithole wine bar in the ass end of
town&lt;/a&gt; to hold my secret meetings.  I mean c&#39;mon,
Bin 38?  It&#39;s got &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.yelp.com/biz/bin-38-san-francisco&#34;&gt;two $$&lt;/a&gt;
on Yelp.  No self-respecting rich dude should ever be seen in a $$ rated
place.  Hell, the places you guys should be &lt;em&gt;building&lt;/em&gt; should require at
least a million dollar membership and the sacrifice of an orphan baby
girl on Winter Solstice.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the spirit of givin&#39; out advice where absolutely none was requested,
I&#39;ve decided to help you guys build the best place for you to get
together and have your cookies and wine.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;First, I&#39;d have like a fucking &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0086356/&#34;&gt;Star
Chamber&lt;/a&gt; with the &lt;em&gt;actual&lt;/em&gt;
Michael Douglas serving me fucking Tea and cookies.  That&#39;d rock pretty
hard right away if only because the movie poster looks damn cool.  A
bunch of old craggy manly heads enveloped with a white light from behind
so your victims can&#39;t make out your faces.  Epic.  I could see you guys
all having the startups you fund stand in front of you while you ask
them in your best old man voice, &#34;Did you make any money today?&#34;  Then
you pull a lever and the failures just get dumped into a shark tank.&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>The Revenge Of PowerSet</title>
            <author>Zed A. Shaw</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1282122987.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1282122987.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 02:06:38 -0700</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;You may think this is a rant, but it&#39;s not what you think.  It&#39;s some
drama here and I&#39;m a little bit mean, but read to the end please.
This may seem like I&#39;m bashing, but I&#39;m actually telling the story in my
way from my perspective.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When I think back to my time trying to get somewhere in Ruby, one
company really stands out: PowerSet.  I&#39;m not sure if you remember, I&#39;m
sure none of you do, but they were going to take on Google.  They were
also that search engine that showed gay pornstars when you looked up
politicians, so already they were actually satisfying an under-satisfied
market.  Namely toe-tapping Republicans.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What made PowerSet annoying is that they hired all these Ruby guys very
early on and then that somehow made PowerSet and these Ruby guys
awesome.  These fairly nice gents became giant ego maniacs overnight and
everyone had to deal with them all the damn time.  You see, there was
(is?) this channel a bunch of Ruby on Rails guys hung out in called
caboose.  Really caboose was this annoying slander factory where people
could talk shit about DHH when he wasn&#39;t around or bitch about how they
should be 54 on &lt;a href=&#34;http://workingwithrails.com/&#34;&gt;Working With Rails&lt;/a&gt;
rather than that asshat zenspider (I was usually #1 mostly because I
didn&#39;t care).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So here we were, and these asshats get jobs at a time when everyone was
begging to use Ruby in a Java/.NET world.  They were made men, on
a level with the 2 or 3 other companies that were actually making shit
with Ruby.  And oh man did they start letting us know it.  Day after day
we&#39;d hear about how boss the PowerSet stickers would look on their
laptops.  Yes, &#39;cause a &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.flickr.com/photos/tychay/784637806/&#34;&gt;guy with a dick on his
chin&lt;/a&gt; looks so fucking
boss.&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>Me And A Hobo Announce A Recommendation For Google</title>
            <author>Zed A. Shaw</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1281672058.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1281672058.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 20:50:54 -0700</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;Since Google seems to think that I asked it to draft up a heavily biased
set of laws that only benefit itself and Verizon I thought it was only
fair that I draft my own proposed recommentation for Google.  Normally
if the FCC wants your fucking opinion they&#39;ll come and ask you...oh and
some professors, and some politicians, and some ISPs and some law
enforcement guys, and other people the FCC has to care about.  But oh
no, Google and Verizon seem to think that somebody wants them to make
laws.  I mean, last time I checked, the politicians that they pay off
with massive donations are the ones who make the laws. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why can&#39;t Google and Verizon just keep doing politics the old fashioned
way?  With bribes, and graft, and lobbyists.  I miss the old days
because at least back then there was some time before shit happened.
Now we get corruption in Internet time.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well, I figure, what the hell, I might as well team up with some dude
and draft my own resolution for Google and Verizon to &lt;em&gt;shut the fuck
up&lt;/em&gt;.  So I present to you, Google, a bi-lateral compromise on why you
should shut the fuck up between myself and A Random Hobo.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Incidentally, I&#39;m not sending this to Verizon because I already know
they&#39;re crooked as shit.  That and I don&#39;t want the NSA to hand over
illegally obtained information to the FBI so I can be arrested like they
did with Qwest&#39;s CEO.&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>Mac &amp; Cheese rant</title>
            <author>Daniel Greenfeld</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1279823157.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1279823157.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:37:14 -0500</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;I&#39;m not a picky eater. I&#39;m willing to eat every meat that is legal in
the United States and wouldn&#39;t mind traveling to places where the laws
are different. I have this strange desire to try pickled insects in a
third world nation. I often eat things I don&#39;t like, such as eggplant.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, the truth is that I really loathe mac &amp;amp; cheese. I hate
cooking it, I hate eating it, I hate cleaning up after it. I&#39;ve thrown
away pots that have been used to cook it. I claim to be different
because I despise this American staple, and silly as you may think it
may be it is my preference not to have anything to do with cheesy
pasta. Heck, it ain&#39;t even healthy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Note: I sometimes like some cheese on top of tomato based sauces or
chili that has pasta mixed into it. This is not the same thing as mac
&amp;amp; cheese.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yet the complication I face is that I have dear friends and family who
think that their prize-winning homemade mac &amp;amp; cheese made from
imported unpasteurized cheese will be something that I love. That I&#39;ll
change and they&#39;ll get the chance to smugly say that it was the
quality of what I&#39;ve eaten that discouraged me.&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>Dear Gartner, Fire Andrea Di Maio</title>
            <author>Zed A. Shaw</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1279735838.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1279735838.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:51:51 -0700</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;Dear Gartner,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I didn&#39;t know you hired racists.  I mean, maybe racist is a bit of a
stretch, but there&#39;s no other word for &#34;asshole who arbitrarily
stereotypes potential customers&#34; so let&#39;s just call Andrea Di Maio the
racist piece of shit he is.  I say this, because in addition to pretty
fucking racist &lt;a href=&#34;http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2010/07/21/keep-developers-out-of-politics-please/&#34;&gt;comments&lt;/a&gt;
about programmers, I&#39;m pretty sure he&#39;s full of all sorts of other
stereo types that are just lovely.  He probably thinks Blacks are
stupid, Latinos have big families, Women should shut up and poop out
kids, and Jews are cheap and killed Jesus.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Because, let me tell you, where there&#39;s smoke there&#39;s fire Gartner, and
any man who&#39;d just come out and say anything about who I am because of
my profession has got to harbor all sorts of evil bullshit mythological
beliefs in his tiny little pathetic mind.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But what do I know, all of the above is just guessing, and Andrea may be
a pretty upstanding guy.  Hell, I&#39;ll give him the benefit of the doubt
that he didn&#39;t give me and just say I take back all the things I just
said about him being a Nazi racist fuck.  He&#39;s probably alright, even if
he is a little fucking ugly.&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>Oh come on</title>
            <author>Maximilian Herkender</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1276871803.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1276871803.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Thu, 3 Jun 2010 15:56:18 -0700</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;I mean I know the Internet hates Flash atm, but did you ever think
that it&#39;s all a bunch of groupthink?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#34;http://blogs.adobe.com/penguin.swf/2010/01/solving_different_problems.html&#34;&gt;As for the slow video thing.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Flash Cookies are there because normal cookies suck, they&#39;re adding
similar stuff in HTML5 for that very reason. Don&#39;t panic they&#39;re
limited to 100k unless you specifically grant more space. Chrome&#39;s
&#34;Clear data&#34; dialog has a link to a url to help you manage them too,
why don&#39;t other browsers do that I don&#39;t know.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As for the broken HTTP status thing. &lt;a href=&#34;http://livedocs.adobe.com/flash/9.0/ActionScriptLangRefV3/flash/events/HTTPStatusEvent.html#status&#34;&gt;I don&#39;t know what you&#39;re talking about.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>Facebook: Die Like AOL Already</title>
            <author>Brian Shumate</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1276871673.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1276871673.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 16:36:34 -0400</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;For a couple weeks now, the usual sources of nerd news have been gushing like a BP disaster with stories concerning Facebook and its various alleged infractions against users&#39; privacy.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;While I&#39;d like to think that none of that crap applies to me, I&#39;d be remiss to overlook some interesting and rarely discussed issues around this whole social networking privacy snafu in the first place.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You see, I don&#39;t use Facebook.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have never used Facebook, and I will never use Facebook.&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>Flash Developers: lrn2fuckingprogramkthxbai</title>
            <author>Paul Davis</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1276871573.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1276871573.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Tue, 4 May 2010 01:26:44 -0400</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;According to [1], there were 500 iPhone apps available for the iPhone 3G on July
11, 2008. According to [2] there were 180,000 apps available April 8, 2010.
That&#39;s roughly (assuming 260 work days a year) 345 application approvals a day.
Assuming a 100% acceptance rate. Given a review team of 100 people, that&#39;s
roughly four (accounting for vacation, sick, etc days) successful apps
a day. (I&#39;m
unable to source a number for an expectation of eight apps a day per review team
member I recall reading but it would fit the order of magnitude.)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There have already been reports of automated analysis of AppStore submissions
from November 2008 for private API usage [3]. The infamous Flash-to-iPhone
packager works by compiling ActionScript to native ARM assembly [4]. This would
quite assuredly break static analysis.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;iPhone OS 4.0 now includes various API&#39;s for background processing. Assuming
[5-6] are correct this is based on Grand Central Dispatch [7]. Given that
applications are now allowed this freedom, it would make sense that the static
analysis tests are going to be more stringent.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Who wants to bet against the idea that the new 3.3.1 isn&#39;t a lawyer&#39;s attempt
at phrasing engineering terminology for what is testable?&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>No subject necessary</title>
            <author>onitake@gmail.com</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1276871478.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1276871478.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:55:57 +0200</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;blockquote&gt;
  &lt;p&gt;... and that it takes all of Adobe and their bosom buddy Microsoft with it ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh yeah, and while we&#39;re at it, it should take its other bosom buddy apple along.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your rant is justified, but apple has become as bad, arrogant, selfish, greedy, etc.
as adobe, ms, the riaa, the mpaa, the wipo, or who else.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Flash sucks orc balls - but that&#39;s no reason to fuck off users by patronising them
about flash support. If they want it, they should have it. If they don&#39;t, they can
have it turned off. By not providing ANY fucking means to use it (save except maybe
for a half-working gnash port for jailbreakers), apple fucks users harder into the
posterior than adobe by publishing a completely fucked up &#34;rich content platform&#34;.&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    
        <item>
            <title>The days of the programmer are over. Long live the programmer.</title>
            <author>Guillaume Theoret</author>
            <link>http://oppugn.us/posts/1276871402.html</link>
            <guid>http://oppugn.us/posts/1276871402.html</guid>
            <pubDate>Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:47:15 -0400</pubDate>
            <description>
                &lt;p&gt;It&#39;s a sad state of affairs if programmers can no longer be famous for
coding. But really, were programmers, at any point in history, capable
of being famous for coding? I&#39;m fairly young so I don&#39;t know much
about what it was like to program back in the assembly, cobol and
fortran days but it seems to me like the famous programmers weren&#39;t
famous for their code back then either, rather they were famous for
the academic papers they wrote.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Then, as far as I can tell it transitioned to the famous programmers
being the ones that wrote books or possibly magazine articles. Then
came the famous blogger/programmer, with blogger definitely the key
part of that dichotomy. Now it&#39;s the ones founding companies and
making a lot of money.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is this really a problem though? Sure, it makes programmers a second
class citizen, relegated to sweat away like the cog they are while
others take credit for their hard work but is that likely to stay that
way?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Well, yes and no.&lt;/p&gt;

            </description>
        </item>
    

    </channel>
</rss>
